得獎學生

老師評語

獎項

平均分數

Online learning

片長: 06:22

good story telling/interesting soud effect and images/enjoyable to watch the video/good conclusion.

第一名

獎金6,000元

91

My Online Communication Experiences

片長: 05:52

The video presents a multi-faceted view of online communication/interaction by international students. Both the pros and cons of online communication are provided.

第二名

獎金3,000元

86.3

My Experience of Online Communication

片長: 05:35

Presenters were pretty organized in the delivery of this presentation. Presenters gave clear and concise facts and explanations of how these facts support the topic. However, it is suggested that the presenters pay more attention to pacing and the use of transition.

第三名

獎金1,000元

84

Tech me home

片長: 04:05

Quite natural delivery. The answers provided by the three interviewees are well-prepared. The sound level and quality are both good.

佳作

83

The Pros and Cons of Online Learning

片長: 05:24

Presenters gave a clear introduction of the topic, so that the audience well understood the purpose of the presentation. Presenters were organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was somewhat clear. For the most part it was not confusing to follow.

佳作

82.7

Impact of online communication

片長: 04:32

Although the information presented is meaningful and adequate, the voiceovers sound like reading a script, lacking emotion.

佳作

82

得獎學生

老師評語

獎項

平均分數

李沂宸(法律一甲)/曾旻琪(財法一)
趙子涵(法律一乙)/蘇義哲(財法一)

The impact of water pollution

片長: 05:19

Presentation has a logical progression of ideas and includes images, video and subtitles that match the spoken words. Also drawings (ex. bacteria) help viewers to understand. Speakers have good spoken English, look at the audience and use gestures. The words are also spoken with vocal inflection to add feeling. Moving between the anchors and reporter also provides some variety of location to add meaning.

第一名

獎金6,000元

94

Disposable Plastics And The Ecological Crisis

片長: 05:20

The opening part is very attractive. Important words are specially marked. The relationship between plastic products and our environment is simply and clearly presented in the video. Voice and facial expressions are natural.

第二名

獎金3,000

89.7

張逸雯(應美一)

Farmhouse Issue in Yilan

片長: 04:35

"Presentation has a logical progression of ideas with music, subtitles and videos from driving through farmland areas. It also contains some large key words in black and white. It finishes up with specific solutions to the problem. The speaker uses good spoken English with vocal inflection to provide emotion. There are some pronunciation errors – “cement” and some grammar errors “what if can an ordinary person like me do?” (what can an ordinary person like me do?)."

第三名

獎金

1,000元

89.3

林子渝(英文一)/顏伯儒(英文一)
張喻晴(英文一)/廖郁蓁(英文一)
陳卿美(英文一)

Don't let the air be the invisible killer!

片長: 04:30

"Presentation has a logical progression of ideas with subtitles. It changes location between the news anchor and the reporter to provide a variety of settings. Speakers usually use good spoken English with some vocal inflection to provide interest. There are some grammar errors “I got cold and allergic easily” (I got colds and allergies easily). Also a spelling error “mam-made” (man-made) – this was done correctly later in the video."

佳作

87

得獎學生

老師評語

獎項

平均分數

陳欣儀(職治一)/陳新雅(職治一)
李昀橦(職治一)/林邑家(職治一) >

What kinds of qualities make those spiritual leaders admirable?

片長: 05:57

Excellent. Thanks for your carefully elaborated presentation. Your video is beautifly edited and the transition of each section is also smooth. In particular, the supporting detalis are nicely provided. I really enjoy watching your video. The only question is that how do you define "spiritual"? The adjective "spiritual" refers to somehting that is religious. Hence, the title may confuse the audience a little bit. Perhaps, your group can re-consider of the word choice.

第一名

獎金
6,000元

89.7

許湘婷(職治一)/陳映諠(職治一)
陳宥希(公衛一)/黃資淳(公衛一)

Advertisement and Consumer

片長: 07:26

Excellent. The video is nicely organized and the overall delievery of the main idea and argument is quite solid and persuasive. I like your awareness of where the sources you take to suport your argument. You did a good acknowledge. The most important part is your good and fluent English speaking. Good job. However, there is only one tiny pronunciation mistake. The vowel sound of noun "service" is mispronounced. All in all, thanks for your excellent work.

第二名

獎金
3,000元

89.3

侯艾嫣(職治一)/李郁萱(職治一)
吳苡安(新傳四)/邱宣翰(新傳四)

Common Characteristics of Influential

片長: 06:01

The analysis of each example is pretty clear, but how/why did you select Adam Gazzaley, JK Rowling, or Albert Einstein? Is it because some of them are related to your major? Perhaps you need to explain at the begining because these examples are related to your research questions and therefore your conclusion. And visual aids are pretty viewer-friendly.

佳作

89.0

鍾語恩(廣告一)/陳玳喬(廣告一)
李芯寧(廣告一)/楊麒勳(廣告一)
葉娍晏(廣告一)

legalization of cannbis

片長: 04:39

Good job. The structure of the video is well-organized, and the argument is also nicely delivered. It's quite persuaisve. One of the reasons for your nice persuasiveness depends on your fluent English speaking and the clean and minmalistic style of visual effect. There are only two questions in your video. The first one is about your survey question. Where is your secod question and how mamy surveyers you design to take this survey? If you can fix these two bugs, your video will be much more better.

佳作

84.3

石雯玄(英文四)/楊欣翰(英文四)
黃馨平(社會四)/熊廷瑄(心理三)

Paper Container: A toxic substance people should be aware of

片長: 06:14

You provide constructive possible solutions,which is good. However, it's a pity that most speakers more like "read" notes rather than "deliver" ideas. It's a pity because you do have informative contents. Perhaps you could try to put what you'd like to express in another way, a way you can deliver more naturally. Plus, it'd be better if you could show us your analyses/the results of the interviews through the visual aids. And as for the visual aids, most parts are not viewer-friendly. Many are not easy to read.

佳作

83