My Glocal Vision in News and Story 英語影音競賽
成果回饋與獎勵： |
標準 |
【E-News 在地關懷、放眼世界】 第一名:10,000(1名)、第二名5,000(1名)、第三名2,000(2名)及獎狀乙紙 |
1. 視覺呈現效果20% 2. 溝通清晰40% 3. 主題確切，內容含英語報導與評論40% |
【E-Story 說故事、傳知識】 第一名:10,000(1名)、第二名5,000(1名)、第三名2,000(2名)及獎狀乙紙 |
1. 視覺呈現效果20% 2. 表達清晰、語調生動40% 3. 主題確切、故事完整、有意義40% |
※得獎名單
主題A. 【E-News 在地關懷、放眼世界】
得獎學生 |
影片簡介 |
獎項 |
|
|
鍾佳欣/葉婧雯/林書宇/劉昱均/詹奕銘
Country of Fraudsters: Overview of Taiwanese Frauds Going Global 片長: 4:58 |
Great oral skills. Everyone speaks fluently. The news anchors look quite professional. They could have some interaction between each other and with the reporters, however. The weakest part is the interview. It makes sense to interview a victim but it is curious why both reporters interview the same college student and at such length. In the interview, there seems to be a shift of perspective when the interviewee refers to people in Taiwan as "they", which is confusing because she is supposedly from here too. | 第一名 獎金10,000 |
|
|
簡子綾/張硯華/鄭渝靜/劉依芃/董祐均
Prophet or Idiot 片長: 04:49 |
A well-focused report on the coincidence of a terrorist attack in Sweden foretold by Trump. Good job synthesizing multiple sources into a coherent piece. There seems to be an editing mistake: at 3:01 the speaker on the left invites the viewer to look at "the following tweets" but no tweets are shown until a lot later, which causes confusion. The ending does not seem conclusive. With the title "Idiot or Prophet?" in mind, the implication in the end seems to be the second. Are you sure about the either-or argument? The speakers need to avoid reading off notes too often to make it a more engaging presentation. | 第二名 獎金5,000 |
|
李哲儀/潘姿吟/蔡旻真 Gender pay gap 片長:05:59 |
Your E-News video is authentically represented and structurally formated. Well-done! You got a very good attention-getter opening which addresses the issue and then you move on to the interview of one female office lady. In the end, you conclude the news with the expert of the related field showing the professional opinion about the current situation of the disparity of the gender pay gap. I think the anchor plays an important role in this news and she did work nicely in the speaking and in the postures with confident attitude. Especailly, the professor in the concluding session is so impressive that her pronounciation is great and she speaks fluently! That's the way to make the audience believe what she talks is true and authoritative. For the pronounciation of the anchor, I think you can practice more and make sure each word is correclt pronounced. Or you can even slow down your speaking speed a little. For the TV commercial sessions, they're interesting, but perhpas, you can removie them from the video and it won't influence your news effect! If doing so, then, in the second interviewing part, you can add one more male interviewee to balance the report. | 第二名 獎金5,000 |
|
吳炯輝/李浩宇/葉蕙嘉/陳郁晴 |
|
第二名 獎金5,000 |
|
|
張詠涵/張瑋倩/周筱媛
NEWS/20170423 片長: 05:24 |
A clear account of the news event. However, it should be specified as a dramatization of the original event to avoid confusion. The interview with the audience member should be justified by explaining what makes her viewpoint significant (a scholar, or a Asian who lived in the US before)? Airbnb's official statement in response to the event could be added to the the report. There is a minor technical problem. In the beginning, the anchor says the she is going to report on her "first news". It's probably a slip of tongue because there is only one news event. There are quite a few language and grammar mistakes, such as "pay 50 dollars to live four persons", "It's a snowstorm", "she were not let us live" and so on. |
第三名 獎金2,000 |
|
|
汪采萱/金沛鈺/謝宛凌/施月大/陳建華
campus pioneer news 片長: 04:53 |
The focus and the purpose of the news report are stated clearly. The anchor might need to have more eye contact with the camera to engage the audience. Mostly fluent delivery, though the interviewees need to have more natural interactions with the reporter and refrain from reading notes saved in cellphone. The light is too dark in the second interview. It's hard to see the interviewee's face. | 第三名 獎金2,000 |
|
主題B. 【E-Story 說故事、傳知識】
得獎學生 | 影片簡介 | 獎項 | |
|
蔡淨如/吳榕萱/洪浩哲/王妤甄/呂芷菱
The Fairytale Nightmare Terminator 片長: 04:38 | 1. 視覺呈現效果 --the drawing presentation is effectively and consistently. 2. 表達、語調 --the story is told clearly and vividly-with good intonation and sound mimicking. 3. 主題、故事完整、有意義 --the story is quite creative and pleasant to watch. The only defect would be the ending, where the commercial slogan should have been presented more impressively. | 第一名 獎金10,000 | |
|
洪秀妍/莊覲維/莊雅婷/曾郁婷
The back of pain 片長: 03:06 | 1. 視覺呈現效果 --OK; the drawing clearly supports the message. 2. 表達清晰、語調生動 : The story telling is clear. The intonation can be improved. 3. 主題確切、故事完整、有意義 A very meaningful story with a clear message. | 第二名 獎金5,000 | |
黃星維/吳旻庭/楊淳羽/張瑞芸 The Fairytale Nightmare Terminator 片長: 05:51
Four wives in our life 片長: 05:51 |
| 第二名 獎金5,000 | |
|
路若煊/吕季恒/蔡依庭/李奕寧
typical students&teachers 片長: 05:16 | 1. 視覺呈現效果: The performances were mostly above average (but some showed a dependence on the script/cell phone). | 第二名 獎金5,000 | |
|
楊岱韋/江子萱/張 軒
typical students&teachers 片長: 05:50 | 1. 視覺呈現效果 The performances were great, the video-editing, also above average (with interesting background music and sound effects 3. 主題、故事完整、有意義 -- engaging topic, and great visuals, though there are some mistakes with grammar and subtitles. | 裁判獎 獎金1,000 |
